Chat with us, powered by LiveChat As a manager, you will use your skill in project management to create your organization’s strategic objectives to support operational plans. In this assessment, you will apply what you lear - Very-Good Essays

As a manager, you will use your skill in project management to create your organization’s strategic objectives to support operational plans. In this assessment, you will apply what you lear

As a manager, you will use your skill in project management to create your organization’s strategic objectives to support operational plans

In this assessment, you will apply what you learned about strategic objectives and external influences on the internal environment. You will consider the external forces and trends that affect the attainment of strategic objectives.

Assessment Deliverable

Write a 350- to 700-word draft of your strategic objectives and measurable outcomes for the company you selected in Week 1. 

Create 4–6 strategic objectives that focus on operational plans. These are your own ideas developed from your external and internal environmental scanning. You will finalize these objectives in your Week 6 implementation plan.

Create 2–4 measurable outcomes that align to your strategic objectives. Each outcome may correspond with more than one strategic objective. These measurable outcomes will aid you in preparing your vision statement later.

Relate how the 5 management functions will support your strategic objectives.

Format any references according to APA guidelines.

MGT/566 v2

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

MGT/566 Grading Rubrics Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Project Management – Strategic Objectives Draft ……………………………………………………………………………………… 2

Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Human Capital Presentation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Strategic Implementation Plan: Part 2 …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 2 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Project Management – Strategic Objectives Draft

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Strategic objectives

Weight: 40%

Created clear and insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans

Created mostly clear and insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans

Created somewhat clear or somewhat insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans

Created unclear or not insightful strategic objectives from internal and external environmental scans, or strategic objectives were not evident

Measurable outcomes

Weight: 40%

Fully aligned measurable outcomes to strategic objectives

Mostly aligned measurable outcomes to strategic objectives

Somewhat aligned measurable outcomes to strategic objectives

Alignment to measurable outcomes was unclear or not evident

Management functions

Weight: 10%

Thoroughly explained how the management functions support strategic objectives

Adequately explained how the management functions support strategic objectives

Somewhat adequately explained how the management functions support strategic objectives

Inadequately explained how the management functions support strategic objectives, or explanation was not evident

Critical thinking and problem solving: Analyze Alternatives

Weight: 5%

Fully recognized a need for a solution and thoroughly explored possible solutions

Moderately recognized a need for a solution and adequately explored possible solutions

Vaguely recognized a need for a solution and narrowly explored possible solutions

Did not or inaccurately recognized a need for a solution and did not explore possible solutions/explored infeasible solutions

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 3 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 4 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Human Capital Presentation

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Unique resources

Weight: 20%

Thoroughly determined the company’s unique resources and clearly described how they create competitive advantages and sustain value

Adequately determined the company’s unique resources and mostly described how they create competitive advantages and sustain value

Somewhat adequately determined the company’s unique resources and somewhat described how they create competitive advantages and sustain value

Did not adequately determine the company’s unique resources or did not clearly describe how they create competitive advantages and sustain value, or determination was not evident

Resources relationship to objectives and outcomes

Weight: 30%

Clearly and insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes

Mostly clearly and insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes

Somewhat clearly or insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes

Unclearly or not insightfully related the unique resources to the strategic objectives and how they contribute to achieving measurable outcomes, or did not relate unique resources to strategic objectives or measurable outcomes

Competitive advantages

Weight: 20%

Comprehensively explained how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages

Adequately explained how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages

Somewhat adequately explained how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages

Inadequately explained, or did not explain, how the company’s people, processes, markets, and technology contribute to its competitive advantages

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 5 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Internal weaknesses

Weight: 20%

Clearly identified any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment

Mostly identified any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment

Somewhat identified any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment

Unclearly identified, or did not identify, any weaknesses in the company’s internal environment

Collaboration: Results Focused

Weight: 5%

Demonstrated a distinguished ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results

Demonstrated a proficient ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results

Demonstrated a marginal ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results

Did not demonstrate the ability to remain goal focused when obstacles and challenges arise to achieve results

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 6 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Strategic Implementation Plan: Part 2

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Leadership skills

Weight: 25%

Thoroughly assessed the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development

Adequately assessed the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development

Somewhat adequately assessed the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development

Did not adequately assess the leadership skills needed to implement the plans and skills gaps that must be addressed through training and development, or assessment was not evident

Strategy and competitive advantages

Weight: 15%

Clearly and insightfully explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan

Mostly clearly and insightfully explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan

Somewhat clearly, with some insight, explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan

Unclearly or with little insight explained how the generic strategy selected will gain or maximize competitive advantages and how key competitive advantages are incorporated in the plan, or explanation was not evident

Organizational design

Weight: 10%

Clearly explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan

Mostly explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan

Somewhat explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan

Unclearly explained how the organizational design may change because of the implementation plan, or explanation was not evident

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 7 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Timeline and milestones

Weight: 20%

Thoroughly developed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones

Mostly thoroughly developed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones

Somewhat thoroughly developed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones

Limitedly detailed timeline for the implementation plan and included major milestones, or timeline with milestones was not evident

Strategic objectives and measurable outcomes

Weight: 20%

Thoroughly summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives

Mostly summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives

Somewhat summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives

Vaguely or poorly summarized how the implementation plan is expected to achieve the finalized strategic objectives and measurable outcomes, noting any changes to the strategic objectives, or summary was not evident

Cultural competence and ethics: Strategic Efforts Toward Inclusion and Equity

Weight: 5%

Thoughtfully engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity

Moderately engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity

Narrowly engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity

Did not engage in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, or collaborations that support diversity and foster inclusion and equity

Grading Rubrics MGT/566 v2 Page 8 of 8

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible

  • MGT/566 Grading Rubrics
    • Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Project Management – Strategic Objectives Draft
    • Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Human Capital Presentation
    • Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Strategic Implementation Plan: Part 2

Are you struggling with this assignment?

Our team of qualified writers will write an original paper for you. Good grades guaranteed! Complete paper delivered straight to your email.

Place Order Now