Chat with us, powered by LiveChat While most companies have diversity programs, only 25% of the employees surveyed in 2017 felt they had benefited from these initiatives (Tsusaka, 2019). As a human resources manager, you mu - Very-Good Essays

While most companies have diversity programs, only 25% of the employees surveyed in 2017 felt they had benefited from these initiatives (Tsusaka, 2019). As a human resources manager, you mu

While most companies have diversity programs, only 25% of the employees surveyed in 2017 felt they had benefited from these initiatives (Tsusaka, 2019). As a human resources manager, you must synthesize change management principles for staffing in dynamic business environments. More simply put, you will demonstrate organizational behavior skills when you help promote an organizational culture that responds appropriately to the needs, attitudes, beliefs, and values that diverse people bring to an organization. 

Times of rapid technological changes, economic difficulties, and labor shortages make it harder for organizations to recruit employees, and so once they do, you need them to want to stay.  

Assessment Deliverable

In this assessment, you are assigned as a lead committee member for the development of a new recruitment and retention program at your organization. You must write a 525- to 700-word recruitment and retention report for the executive team. Include the following in your report:

  • Justify why emphasizing diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) better serves the organization’s management principles.
  • Assess how DEIB could improve organizational goals related to employee recruitment, employee retention, and organizational leadership.
  • Recommend employee training initiatives to support your DEIB program. 

Format your references according to APA guidelines. 

MGT/571 v2

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

MGT/571 Grading Rubrics Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Organizational Behavior Recruitment and Retention Report ……………………………………………………………………….. 2

Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Performance Improvement Proposal ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Employee Relations and Security Plan …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6

Grading Rubrics MGT/571 v2 Page 2 of 7

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Organizational Behavior Recruitment and Retention Report

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

DEIB and management principles

Weight: 30%

Clear and insightful justification of how emphasis on DEIB serves the organization’s management principles

Mostly clear and mostly insightful justification of how emphasis on DEIB serves the organization’s management principles

Somewhat clear and somewhat insightful justification of how emphasis on DEIB serves the organization’s management principles

Cursory justification with limited insight of how emphasis on DEIB serves the organization’s management principles or justification not evident

DEIB impact on recruitment and retention

Weight: 30%

Thorough assessment of how DEIB can improve employee recruitment and retention and organizational leadership

Adequate assessment of how DEIB can improve employee recruitment and retention and organizational leadership

Partially adequate assessment of how DEIB can improve employee recruitment and retention and organizational leadership

Superficial assessment of how DEIB can improve employee recruitment and retention and organizational leadership or assessment not evident

DEIB support training programs

Weight: 30%

Sophisticated and insightful recommendations for training initiatives to support DEIB

Mostly sophisticated and mostly insightful recommendations for training initiatives to support DEIB

Somewhat sophisticated and somewhat insightful recommendations for training initiatives to support DEIB

Limitedly sophisticated with little insight in recommendations for training initiatives to support DEIB or recommendations not evident

Cultural competence and ethics: Strategic efforts toward equity, inclusion, and belonging

Weight: 5%

Thoughtfully engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster equity, inclusion, and belonging

Moderately engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster equity, inclusion, and belonging

Narrowly engaged in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, and collaborations that support diversity and foster equity, inclusion, and belonging

Did not sufficiently engage in overt and deliberate planning, ethical actions, or collaborations that support diversity and foster equity, inclusion, and belonging

Grading Rubrics MGT/571 v2 Page 3 of 7

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible

Grading Rubrics MGT/571 v2 Page 4 of 7

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Performance Improvement Proposal

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Bureaucratic issue summary and proposed solutions

Weight: 10%

Clear summary and insightful proposed solutions, including relevant employees, to bureaucratic issue

Mostly clear summary and mostly insightful proposed solutions, including relevant employees, to bureaucratic issue

Somewhat vague summary and proposed solutions with some insight, including relevant employees, to bureaucratic issue

Vague summary or proposed solutions including relevant employees lacked insight or were not evident

Implementation strategies

Weight: 10%

Innovative implementation strategies include relevant employees

Mostly innovative implementation strategies include relevant employees

Somewhat adequate implementation strategies include relevant employees

Inadequate or vague implementation strategies include relevant employees or were not evident

Monitoring strategies

Weight: 10%

Insightful strategies for monitoring solutions

Mostly insightful strategies for monitoring solutions

Somewhat insightful strategies for monitoring solutions

Strategies for monitoring solutions lacked insight or were not evident

Impact on organization’s performance

Weight: 25%

Clear and insightful explanation of how proposal improves organizational performance

Mostly clear and mostly insightful explanation of how proposal improves organizational performance

Somewhat clear and somewhat insightful explanation of how proposal improves organizational performance

Explanation of how proposal improves organizational performance lacked clarity and insight or was not evident

Communication plan

Weight: 10%

Thorough communication plan for progress and results

Adequate communication plan for progress and results

Partially adequate communication plan for progress and results

Inadequate communication plan or was not evident

Leadership skills

Weight: 25%

Comprehensive description of leadership skills needed to support proposal’s execution

Sufficient description of leadership skills needed to support proposal’s execution

Somewhat sufficient description of leadership skills needed to support proposal’s execution

Insufficient description of leadership skills needed to support proposal’s execution

Grading Rubrics MGT/571 v2 Page 5 of 7

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Collaboration: Results focused

Weight: 5%

Demonstrated a distinguished ability to remain goal focused and achieve results when presented with obstacles and challenges

Demonstrated a proficient ability to remain goal focused and achieve results when presented with obstacles and challenges

Demonstrated a marginal ability to remain goal focused and achieve results when presented with obstacles and challenges

Did not sufficiently demonstrate the ability to remain goal focused or achieve results when presented with obstacles and challenges

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible

Grading Rubrics MGT/571 v2 Page 6 of 7

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Employee Relations and Security Plan

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Summary of breach

Weight: 25%

Comprehensive summary of the security breach showed keen insight of the legal and ethical issues

Adequate summary of the security breach showed insight of the legal and ethical issues

Somewhat adequate summary of the security breach showed little insight of the legal and ethical issues

Vague summary of the security breach lacked insight of the legal and ethical issues or was not evident

Notification process and incident reporting

Weight: 10%

Clear and comprehensive recommendations for notifying impacted customers, reporting incident to government authorities, and hiring cybersecurity contractor

Mostly clear and mostly comprehensive recommendations for notifying impacted customers, reporting incident to government authorities, and hiring cybersecurity contractor

Partially clear and somewhat limited recommendations for notifying impacted customers, reporting incident to government authorities, and hiring cybersecurity contractor

Unclear or vague recommendations for notifying impacted customers, reporting incident to government authorities, and hiring cybersecurity contractor or were not evident

Communication plan

Weight: 20%

Insightful employee communication plan to address employee expectations

Mostly insightful employee communication plan to address employee expectations

Somewhat insightful employee communication plan to address employee expectations

Uninsightful or not evident employee communication plan to address employee expectations

Training plan

Weight: 20%

Insightful cybersecurity training plan for employees

Mostly insightful cybersecurity training plan for employees

Somewhat insightful cybersecurity training plan for employees

Uninsightful or not evident cybersecurity training plan for employees

Monitoring

Weight: 15%

Insightful strategies to monitor cybersecurity- related activities

Mostly insightful strategies to monitor cybersecurity- related activities

Somewhat insightful strategies to monitor cybersecurity-related activities

Uninsightful or not evident strategies to monitor cybersecurity-related activities

Grading Rubrics MGT/571 v2 Page 7 of 7

Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Cultural competence and ethics: Respectful communication and interaction

Weight: 5%

Strongly engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural settings; inclusively acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities

Sufficiently engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural settings; adequately acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities

Insufficiently engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural settings; narrowly acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities

Did not sufficiently engage in transparent conversations or respond ethically in professional intercultural settings; inappropriately acknowledged or did not acknowledge the value of others within diverse communities

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible

  • MGT/571 Grading Rubrics
    • Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Organizational Behavior Recruitment and Retention Report
    • Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Performance Improvement Proposal
    • Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Employee Relations and Security Plan

Are you struggling with this assignment?

Our team of qualified writers will write an original paper for you. Good grades guaranteed! Complete paper delivered straight to your email.

Place Order Now