a. Identify a clinical problem for which an NP could advocate for an evidence-based change that is client-focused. Avoid topics that are related to full practice authority, staffing, or burnout. The problem should be centered around clients and the care nurse practitioners provide for the population.
b. Describe the scope and impact of the problem.
c. Discuss the role of the NP in addressing the problem.
d. Explain why the problem is of interest to you.
1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
·
a. Identify a clinical problem for which an NP could advocate for an evidence-based change that is client-focused. Avoid topics that are related to full practice authority, staffing, or burnout. The problem should be centered around clients and the care nurse practitioners provide for the population.
b. Describe the scope and impact of the problem.
c. Discuss the role of the NP in addressing the problem.
d. Explain why the problem is of interest to you.
2. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site. :
·
a. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
b. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
c. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
d. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
|
· NR585NP_W1 Discussion Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Application of Knowledge view longer description |
20 pts Excellent All requirements met. 18 pts Very Good 3 requirement met. 17 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 10 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. |
/ 20 pts |
|
Integration of Evidence view longer description |
12 pts Excellent All requirements met. 11 pts Very Good 4 requirements met. 10 pts Satisfactory 3 requirements met. 6 pts Needs Improvement 1-2 requirements met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. |
/ 12 pts |
|
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue view longer description |
13 pts Excellent All requirements met. 11 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 7 pts Needs Improvement One requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. |
/ 13 pts |
|
Professionalism in Communication view longer description |
2.5 pts Excellent 0–1 errors. 2 pts Very Good 2–3 errors. 1.5 pts Satisfactory 4-5 errors. 1 pts Needs Improvement 6-7 errors. 0 pts Unsatisfactory More than 7 errors. |
/ 2.5 pts |
|
Reference Citation view longer description |
2.5 pts Excellent 0-1 errors. 2 pts Very Good 2 errors. 1.5 pts Satisfactory 3-4 errors. 1 pts Needs Improvement 5-6 errors. |